September 11, 2001 Research & Archives

Five Men Detained As Suspected Conspirators Wednesday, September 12, 2001 By PAULO LIMA Staff Writer "About eight hours after terrorists struck Manhattan's tallest skyscrapers, police in Bergen County detained five men who they said were found carrying maps linking them to the blasts. The five men, who were in a van stopped on Route 3 in East Rutherford around 4:30 p.m., were being questioned by police but had not been charged with any crime late Tuesday. The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages but did not find any explosives, authorities said. However, sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot. "There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted," the source said. "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." Sources also said that bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives, although officers were unable to find anything. The FBI seized the van for further testing, authorities said. Sources said the van was stopped as it headed east on Route 3, between the Hackensack River bridge and the Sheraton hotel. As a precaution, police shut down Route 3 traffic in both directions after the stop and evacuated a small roadside motel near the Sheraton. Sources close to the investigation said the men said they were Israeli tourists, but police had not been able to confirm their identities. Authorities would not release their names. East Rutherford officers stopped the van after the FBI's Newark Field Office broadcast an alert asking surrounding police departments to look for a white Chevrolet van, police said. "We got an alert to be on the lookout for a white Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration and writing on the side," said Bergen County Police Chief John Schmidig. "Three individuals were seen celebrating in Liberty State Park after the impact. They said three people were jumping up and down." The East Rutherford officers summoned the county police bomb squad, New Jersey state troopers, and FBI agents, who waited alongside the van as prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office tried to obtain a warrant to search the van late Tuesday, Schmidig said. By 10 p.m., members of the bomb squad were picking through the van and X-raying packages found inside, Schmidig said.

At a near-by hotel in New Jersey:

A business traveler staying at the Homestead Studio Suites Hotel said she watched state troopers drive the suspects away in a procession of state police cars about 5 p.m.

The woman, who asked not to be identified, said the people detained appeared to be white men, but she could not give more details. About 5:30 p.m., police evacuated the hotel without offering guests an explanation.

"First, they told us we could hang out in the lobby, but then they told us we had to leave," the traveler said.

At 10 p.m., the hotel guest said she could see at least two police officers searching through the van while a crowd of other officers kept their distance. Except for police vehicles and a tow truck, the service road beside Route 3 was empty, she said.



Source: Killtown, The Record - N.J. News

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/bombtrucks/9-11 FBI Issues A Nationwide APB For A White Van With Urbank.mp4 Nationwide APB is Broadcast for a white van with Urban Moving Systems on the back.

The FBI puts out a nationwide All Points Bulletin, to keep police and citizens on the lookout for a 'suspicious white van, with Urban Moving Systems on the back" Before the towers collapsed, four people were on top of a white van celebrating the attacks and videotaping them while cheering. Later, multiple car bombs went off at ground zero before the towers fell. Even later that day, another van was pulled over by police which matched this description, and the van was found to test positive for explosives as well as had detonators in it....all occupants were Israeli. They were detained for 71 days, then sent back to Israel with no charges Sources said the FBI alert, known as a BOLO or "Be On Lookout," was sent out at 3:31 p.m. It read: "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet vanwith 'Urban Moving Systems' sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. "Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals." FBI spokeswoman Sandra Carroll declined to comment on the incident late Tuesday. State police Lt. Col. Barry W. Roberson confirmed the traffic stop at a late night news briefing at state police headquarters in Trenton. He would not elaborate, however.

Sources: Killtown

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/bombtrucks/Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11.mp4 Audio from Police Broadcast

Source: Business Insider

   
by Ashley Lutz

    Jun. 14, 2012, 9:49 AM 2,249,865

This infographic created by Jason at Frugal Dad shows that almost all media comes from the same six sources.

That's consolidated from 50 companies back in 1983.

NOTE: This infographic is from last year and is missing some key transactions. GE does not own NBC (or Comcast or any media) anymore. So that 6th company is now Comcast. And Time Warner doesn't own AOL, so Huffington Post isn't affiliated with them.

But the fact that a few companies own everything demonstrates "the illusion of choice," Frugal Dad says. While some big sites, like Digg and Reddit aren't owned by any of the corporations, Time Warner owns news sites read by millions of Americans every year.

Here's the graphic:

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/Newscasters Agree- A Christmas Present Or Two Or Ten Edition.mp4 Conan Shows how the news is not real news at all.

Our news media used to compete for news and exclusive stories but now they all propagate the exact same pictures and story-lines so that no matter where you get your news  it will be the same exact story (official story). In this way the government can control what you see and believe. This sounds like communist China or North Korea to me. Why is our government telling us we are free all the while attempting to control our thinking just like those communist countries do? Does the cow ever realize that it is being groomed just so that it can be slaughtered and eaten? If it every does, it is already too late... It's like a Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff said in his act, "In Russia we only had two TV channels. Channel One was pro da. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One." It is not this bad in the USA yet but when every channel you are FREE to turn to shares the same exact point of view, you only have one point of view; the governments. This brings to mind another saying by Yakov Smirnoff "Many people are surprised to hear that we have comedians in Russia, but they are there. They are dead, but they are there". This is almost what it is coming to when you don't believe the "Official Story" and ask questions or speak out about why it is not true. In the 50's the C.I.A. decided to infiltrate the media so that they could control the propaganda. This project was called "Project Mockingbird" aptly named because they were going to have all the media say the same things in order to influence the public in the way that they wanted the news viewed. Well, if you heard it on the news it has to be true, Right!?

In the old days when a news story broke, you changed from channel to channel to get more information because all news stations were independent and had their own views and sources for the news. There used to be "Exclusive New" that one news station had over the others. This was used to get the viewers to watch their station because only they had this news. Today it is all different, no matter which channel you choose you will not get any new information that the others do not have because they all get it from the same source. Now if that news happens to be show a particularity political agenda in a bad light, you won't be seeing that news ANYWHERE!

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/Proof that the news is scripted.mp4 The news people are just Mockingbirds

In this way; when the "official story" is given, you will not be able to find a different point of view. So when everyone is in agreement it has to be true, yes? Supposed this happened with Watergate? We would never have had Nixon resign the office of President of The United States because the "official story" would have been whitewashed and you would have never heard of Watergate, and if you did the story might have been some lone nut that broke in with a magic bullet... But that reporter was allowed to investigate and the news fell where it fell with no agenda to pursue or master to obey. They made sure this would never happen again to their agenda. You can generally tell when an "official story" has been manipulated and/or whitewashed. It is most always surrounded by documents and evidence that has to be kept from the public for a matter of national or public security. Also the documents at the time of their release will be heavily redacted or some future date will be applied to the documents release when most everyone involved will be dead already. This way no one every gets prosecuted and if their is anyone who remember the incident, is still alive the information that they have cannot be corroborated.  It's a shell game...

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/Who Benefited From 9-11-.mp4 Who Benefited From 9-1

9/11: Who Really Benefited? From: Truth Theory By Captain America Michel Chossudovsky, July 24, 2011 Forget so-called conspiracy theories. Instead look at reality. Dare ask yourself who actually seems to have benefited from the 9-11 calamity. In light of the debt ceiling debates and the continuous corrupt politics as usual of Washington D.C., it is time for the American people, and individual states of this federation, to look at a troubling set of facts. It seems there were "several" beneficiaries of 9-11 that don't exactly fit the story line we were constantly fed by the propaganda machine and mainstream media as to how to connect the dots (which we were rhetorically asked to do). Here is a list of peoples that benefited. Most of this list is factual. Some are more opinion but with strong support in reality-based argument: 1) The New York Port Authority was having difficulty renting out space in the Twin Towers. More importantly there was a huge asbestos liability. Surprisingly these Towers were sold to a new owner Larry Silverstein just three months prior—who managed to get an insurance contract for a big payout if any of the Tower buildings got hit by an airplane. This is a fact.

2) Our first international move was to bomb Afghanistan under the assumption that people there were involved. So the heroin industry of Afghanistan came back to life in a big way—that is international and local drug cartels rediscovered a gold mine of money supply. Bin Laden and the Taliban, because of their religious fanaticism, pretty much closed down the trade to a trickle. But after the bombing shake-up, people connected with the heroin trade in Central Asia reaped billion dollars rewards—including money-laundering groups of financiers—such as banksters, etc. (And this is pretty much all the U.S. military/ intelligence has really accomplished—despite all the rhetoric and high-sounding goals about exporting democracy.) This is fact and not fiction. 3) Investors of profitable corporations connected to the military industrial complex made a killing (pun intended). Obviously war has been profitable for some industries for eons as we are told by most war historians profits are an inevitable consequence of war for merchants of death yet they say profit is "not" the driving force behind war. Think again. For our American culture, since at least the Vietnam War, it seems to have become the driving force. (What else does America still manufacture?) Prior to 9/11 there was little in the way of war material inventories being depleted. But soon after 9/11 this all changed. In fact some corporate stocks immediately went up in value—as did some military contracts. Note as well that after the cold war both the Pentagon and the Intelligence apparatus should have cut their budgets in half. (But then no one would have been promoted and the Pentagon would have lost some of its clout.) That did not happen. Rather the budgets doubled in size. How is that for financial austerity? This is fact and not fiction. 4) Some powerful industry leaders and think tank politicos believed it was necessary for certain "companies" to "control" various strategic resources such as oil and gas. And not surprisingly the very countries in which we declared a war against terrorists are surprisingly the same countries that contain such resources—especially in the Middle East. Gas and oil reserves are coveted by every industrial civilization and every military as a necessity. For example, there was a plan to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan to ship out from the Indian ocean—requiring stable societies that don't sabotage pipelines. Nevertheless despite things not going as planned oil companies for whatever reason reaped huge profits. Fact and not fiction. 5) Advocates, such as Paul Bremer, for extreme laissez faire economic policies, attempted to rewrite an Iraqi constitution to promote a free market system of neo-liberal economic principles to make it especially easy for foreign nations to own Iraq's resources. And if you do your research you will come to learn that the U.S. did not have any gripes with Saddam Hussein until he kicked oil companies out of Iraq because they wanted to take the lion's share of the profits. He nationalized oil. This is fact and not fiction. 6) Israel benefited by having one of their neighboring enemies, namely Saddam Hussein and his standing army, weakened and preoccupied. It is not a coincidence that advocates and newspaper pundits most defensive about our invasion happen to be strong advocates of Israel's right-wing will. Evidence clearly shows that some Israeli supporters were part of the culture of deception to take us to war with Iraq—as they are now working to take us to war with Iran with a similar pattern of phony intelligence. Equally it is a fact that whatever Middle East group harbors hostility toward Israel is now considered terrorist in nature to Americans. It is a fact that the Israeli lobby pushed hard for war with Iraq. 7) Right-wing politicos, especially Christian and Judaic, who like to promote prejudice against anything Muslim and Arab benefited. Since 9-11 there has been a constant propaganda war against Muslims throughout Western countries. (This is not to argue that Americans should not be wary of foreign motives.) But the fact is that those who do not wish Muslims to have influence in this culture have clearly wages a major propaganda campaign for Westerners to fear and distrust a huge segment of the world's population—as a "cultural clash" or clash of civilizations like the medieval era of The Crusades. This is to say that Israel's enemies have become our enemies as "neocon" propaganda campaign harps on "Islamo-fascism," "Islamo-extremism," and "Islamo-fanaticism". Meanwhile this event is used to further persuade Americans Israel is America's "natural" ally and partner against the forces of evil. (Yet rightwing Israelis too are not willing to separate Church and State and so they discriminate against those not Jewish. Therefore they too do not share our democratic values of equality for "all" people—like many of the theocratic countries in the Middle East.) This is opinion but it still reflects reality. 8 ) Politically motivated people with the desire to use "fear," namely terrorism, as an excuse to curtail and destroy civil liberties and freedoms normally honored in democratic countries. We have become more a fascist state with Homeland Security surveillance. This curtailment is similar to those who continue to try to censor free speech—and make it more difficult to have the right to "associate" via technologies such as the Internet. Such mentality has allowed spying on citizens by "privatized" corporations not accountable to the tax paying public who pay organizations to secretly spy and keep records on its own citizenry. Obama and his team have done nothing to make real, substantive changes, and in fact have reinforced this tyranny. The curtailment of our freedoms is fact and not fiction. 9) Some international political operatives willing to take American bribe money in exchange to playing and saying our tune have benefited, such as some political factions in the Middle East who equally play they game with our tax dollars—including journalists who will write and say whatever Uncle Sam wants as long as there is a brick of one hundred dollar bills as "disappeared" just like military contracts that did not get performed—but were still played. This could also include those creating phony websites to spew messages or take credit for events done by others. 10) People with a desire to destroy the political strength and good will of the American people and government. Our country is no longer looked upon as a "positive" force for democracy. Further our economy has been severely damaged by corrupt forces willing to sacrifice real national security to greedy and self-interested ends. We are seen as the rogue state by too many. It doesn't seem to bother some profiting that America goes broke invading foreign countries—irrespective of what the rest of the world thinks—and what could be a long term disaster—if not a World War 3. (It almost seems like a deliberate foil to destroy military preparedness and to weaken our security.) Furthermore, those who believe in a two class system benefited because the wealth investor class, including most of the Congress and Senate, are "not" sending their kids to die—rather they rely on a volunteer military of lower and middle class kids that can't find jobs or have few prospects to go to school. 11) Along with this financial bust is a drive to destroy liberal notions of any kind of welfare for the less fortunate—save welfare for corrupt corporations. While it is true that there is no free lunch (unless you live in the beltway) there is also way too much scorn for people who are not super-rich as deserving some kind of humanity. Perhaps Obama should let the country default. Perhaps individual states "should" give serious consideration to secede from the Union. It has become one massive failure anyway. This litany is as contentious as the list of grievances in the Declaration of Independence written over two hundred years ago. And there is good reason to modify our current banking system and the Federal Reserve. The U.S. Congress, like most pseudo-liberal chicken lefties, who have not had the guts to look seriously at what likely happened on 9/11, or why, have succumbed to the cowardliness of voting to not close the U.S. gulag. They are more afraid of their own lost of stature than they are of honoring the rights of law and justice. Meanwhile the legal system—id est lawyers—have been far too compliant. This is to say that the U.S. is being strangulated by corporate America and its finance sector. This is a form of slavery to be manipulated into doing things under false assumptions. Why the ultra rich became even more so, they "own" Congress with their bribery of lobby money and especially the Republican party—despite all the Tea Party advocates. You may not like these realities. Few do. So go ahead and continue to shun all "theories" about 9-11 as mere skewed imagination. Because while it is true that 99.99% of the Government is innocent that doesn't mean a relatively small, but high-ranking cabal, could not have been involved—especially given all the security transgressed and air force stand down that ensued. Still it is easy to point fingers at identifiable groups of people as over-generalizations. Nevertheless many people looked the other way to not notice the dots the machine was drawing was itself tainted—which had its own wisdom of reticence. But where are we to go as a culture if we continue to play blind? You can believe in fantasy as most people choose—because in the short term it feels easier. But it may turn out to be worse in the longer term with both parties being irremediably corrupt. More importantly to the sell out of our human rights to corporations with laws like Citizens United vs. the Federal Elections Commission. Good Luck to all people who think they know something because they have been conditioned to believe what they currently do. Yet ask yourself how many Muslims actually benefited? Then ask that irrespective of who did it, does it not seem that our culture has some issues to contend with and some bureaucracy to address besides the liberal agenda? If lawyers don't start making more noise we could have some serious problems.

Flight 93 Crash Site 1994	This photo was taken from Google Earth in 1994 of Shanksville Mining site. You can see the area in the red rectangle where the same gash is in the ground that the government is saying that United Airlines Flight 93's wings made in 2001.
Flight 93 Crash Site 2001	In this photo, the only thing added to the gash in the ground was the center hole. No plane did this. So the media report that a black box was found here is totally false and just the official story that they would like us to believe.

Net Neutrality is the internet's guiding principle: It preserves our right to communicate freely online.

Net Neutrality means an internet that enables and protects free speech. It means that ISPs should provide us with open networks — and shouldn't block or discriminate against any applications or content that ride over those networks. Just as your phone company shouldn't decide who you call and what you say on that call, your ISP shouldn't interfere with the content you view or post online.

Without Net Neutrality, cable and phone companies could carve the internet into fast and slow lanes. An ISP could slow down its competitors' content or block political opinions it disagreed with. ISPs could charge extra fees to the few content companies that could afford to pay for preferential treatment — relegating everyone else to a slower tier of service. This would destroy the open internet.


When you go online you have certain expectations. You expect to be connected to whatever website you want. You expect that your cable or phone company isn't messing with the data and is connecting you to all websites, applications and content you choose. You expect to be in control of your internet experience.

When You Use The Internet You Expect Net Neutrality.

Net Neutrality is the basic principle that prohibits internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use. Net Neutrality is the way that the internet has always worked.

In 2015, millions of activists pressured the Federal Communications Commission to adopt historic Net Neutrality rules that keep the internet free and open — allowing you to share and access information of your choosing without interference.

But right now this win is in jeopardy: Trump's FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, wants to destroy Net Neutrality. And on May 18, the FCC voted to let Pai's internet-killing plan move forward.


Now there are agencies, corporations and individuals that want to impede upon Net Neutrality. The move will limit free speech by giving power to the corporation and government agencies to limit what you can say online, websites you can visit, how fast your connection is and other such limitations. This move would deter any voice that is not mainstream from being heard just like in the media (news and television). This would make it easier for the government to silence you if you have ideas that do not go with their point of view.

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/Black 9-11- Money, Motive, Technology, and Plausible Deniaby.mp4 Black 9-11- Money, Motive, Technology, and Plausible Deniaby

Our Government Is Corrupt! - We Must Change This! We need to hold our government office holders accountable. If you have seen the first Die Hard film, then you know the plot. Fake a terrorist event to perform a heist. Get everyone looking for one type of event and not the other. It does not only happen in the movies... As it were; anyone in any position of failure of defense on 9/11 NEVER got fired or reprimanded, In fact most were promoted. How does that work for normal people, you fail in a very important way in your job and get promoted...

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/Be the Next Hero- The Investigation of United Flight 93.mp4 Be the Next Hero - The Investigation of United Flight 93

Investigation of United Flight 93 After planes crashed in New York and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, employees at the Pittsburgh FBI weren't sure where to respond. Then news came of a fourth plane--United Flight 93--heading their way. Video Transcript I had an assignment to report to the Pittsburgh office that morning. I happened to be listening to the radio. They had a report of a plane hitting the World Trade Center. I thought, "Wow, I wonder. A mishap of a plane going to 1 of the airports?" Didn't strike me as terror at that time, I just didn't know what was going on. 'Course everybody remembers it, that first tower seen with the smoke. We're kind of in and out, and then of course the second plane hits Just about everybody in the office, I think, had crowded into the break room at that time, and everyone was obviously concerned as to what was going on. Then there was a report about the Pentagon

Initially, we were thinking because I was on the Evidence Response Team that we would probably be going to New York to help there. Then when the plane hit the Pentagon, we weren't sure which location we'd end up at We then got a call about another plane potentially coming our way that was in distress. They believed it was coming from Cleveland and it may need to crash land at our airport here in Johnstown. now it was that this may be deliberate, that it may be acts of terrorism, it would potentially be a crime scene in our jurisdiction. Before we got to the airport though, we were told no, to divert from there, that a plane had crashed in Shanksville. And I just remember thinking, "That's our territory. That's our squad." I got back to my car, and started out of the city as quickly as I could. I think we finally arrived out at the scene between two and three o'clock that afternoon. The plane crashed shortly after 10 AM. We had an RA out near that site, and they responded initially. We would have been the first because it's 20 minutes as we drove that day. I expected to see fuselage, remnants of a plane, which I didn't see anything but pretty much smoke and some fires. I saw absolutely no signs that an airplane was present, no matter what direction I looked. You didn't know that a plane had crashed there. You had a crater and the initial crater was probably 15 feet deep but we didn't have big plane parts laying everywhere. It looked like the plane had hit but there's not a lot of evidence of the airplane. And I've described it a lot of times as, basically, a knife through hot butter. What I saw when I got out there was kind of, I'd describe it as a crater. There was a mound of dirt above it and when you stood above the mound, you could actually see the wings, the outline of the wings and the main fuselage, the center of the plane, how it went down into the ground. There was a misty smoke in the air from the jet fuel that had set the woods on fire. It was very barren, It had been a strip mine. So it was a a very barren area with some trees behind and that's what burnt. As far as the odor, it wasn't as bad as you might think. There were, obviously, certain spots that you would hit and you had the smell of death. My immediate reaction was, "There are no survivors here. This is not a rescue effort. This is a crime scene, a recovery effort." But it looked... like an organized form of chaos, if that makes any sense. Because you had o many people coming in, but all anybody wanted to do was to help. Once the perimeter was established and the next day as command posts were established, the evidence response team from Pittsburgh, Cleveland, I think Chicago, teams were called in. We had teams come in, and I thought to myself, "How are you going to have this many ERT teams from so many offices in the country come into this area and work as one unit?" It's not a natural sort of thing because you work with the same people day in and day out, and you know what to expect from them, but now you've got Knoxville, Cincinnati, Detroit, Louisville, Cleveland, working with Pittsburgh people, and West Virginia people. Anyone east of Pittsburgh went to either the Pentagon or the World Trade Center. All the teams that we brought in were west of Pittsburgh and within driving distance because all the flights had been grounded by that point. Construction Equipment. I think we had about a hundred ERT personnel come in, and that doesn't include all the support personnel that they brought in to support the mission. we had our safety officers there to check the air quality for us. Initially, they determined that we should be wearing regular tie back boots, and if we were working in the crater then we needed respiratory protection. You really can't go much beyond a 12-hour shift. People are on their hands and knees, crawling through this site, looking for debris, personal effects, and human remains. It's very physically and emotionally taxing. There were some real significant finds that they were getting very early on. I was shocked at the number of items that they were able to recover We found great evidence at Flight 93. We found the passports of the highjacks. We found the notes they had written for themselves. We found a knife that we believe was used by one of the highjacks. The other crash sites had a lot more things to deal with. They have buildings collapsing on the sites. They had a lot of recovery efforts. They had a lot of people who survived in the collapse of those buildings that they had to rescue. We didn't have a building collapse. The only people injured at this site were the forty people who were killed on that plane. Once we did start processing, there was a big push to find the black boxes so that we could out maybe what had happened on board the plane. We were pretty sure that the flight data recorder and cock pit voice recorder were going to be in the crater. They were concerned that there was a possibility that they could have landed in the pond, so we brought in divers from the Navy, because at the time only the Navy had the equipment to hear the cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders ping when they were underwater. We actually found the first recorder in the crater five minutes before they arrived on the scene. I can't remember if it was that night or the next night, we ended up finding the other recorder in the crater as well. I was there when we discovered the black box. There was a lot of pressure from all of the sites, not just New York and the Pentagon, to locate the data recorder and the black box. It was a big deal when we did find it and I believe it was slightly over 25 feet into the crater. In the case of the flight data and voice recorders, they were taken out to Seattle because they were damaged to the point where they had to go back to the manufacturer. Agents were hand carrying those, and flying them out across country. I'm the chain-of-custody for the cockpit voice recorder. So we had had a gentleman from ERF who was an audio specialist and myself, we accompanied the evidence out to the state of Washington - Honeywell. Honeywell worked through the first day, and then midday Sunday they started up again, and they worked into the evening and they got it. There's a certain high pitch frequency which is just, you might call it white noise, but on the airplane it's this high pitch tone. During a certain struggle with, which I'll presume to be the pilot because you do hear some screaming and some 'No.' Then a winded individual gives a command. Maybe five minutes later, that same sort of speech is given. That is the only English that I hear that I presume to be coming from the person who's now in control of the airplane. There's breaking glass. I don't know if I can say there's a fight going on but clearly there's some - aggressive action. Over the copier machine - color printer - is coming out the flight data recorder output. And the pilot explained what the various printouts were. There were a number of pages that came off, and essentially it shows from on the ground, takeoff, to the crash. The pilot attempted to knock people off balance by to knock people off balance with the movement of the control stick but because you're in the center line, it's not going to do nearly as much. The FBI pilot noted that if an experienced pilot were in control of that plane, he would have dipped the plane up and down to knock people off their feet that way. Which, of course, is not what occurred. And even though it may have slowed people down the first time, in the second iteration where that person controlling the plane does this, physics ended up taking over, and towards, right before the end of the that flight, the plane actually inverts. I want to say that the final speed was near or just nexus of 600 miles an hour. if you look at the response at Shanksville, you look at the investigation that was done, you look at the recordings and the phone calls that were made, you can piece together what the passengers on that plane did. At no part of our investigation showed that anything happened other than what has been told to the public over the last 15 years - The passengers on Flight 93, in a heroic action, charged the cockpit of that airplane, and cause dthose hijackers to abort their mission, and take that plane into the ground. I think they pretty much are heroes naturally but true Americans. They did something that no one hopes to be called to do and pretty much you know your fate and to be able to do that, the belief is that plane was going to D.C,. to Washington DC. Where it went down, unfortunately the only victims were them and they saved countless numbers of lives, destruction, devastation, in a day that already had so many tragedies The site, I think it's just a great tribute to the people on the plane that they've kept it so simple. I try to get back. I try to get my family back up there to show them the history of what occurred, and to me that is solemn ground. To me it's a national cemetery. They were the first people to fight back against the forces of evil that took those planes down. You hope you're never called to do that but what they did was... They are, true heroes. True American heroes. I think the legacy of what happened at Shanksville is that we still live with the effects of 9/11 today. Nobody that was alive at that time is unaffected by it, whether you were in the bureau or not. We live in a different world now. It changed the FBI, it changed the world as to the way we look at things and we do things. It's really hard to believe that there are so many people that have come into the FBI since September 11th and really didn't live through our experiences in the FBI in that role. For so many of us that work those sites, that's what we really remember most about our career. We did a very good job and I think we hold our head high. But know that you can't let your guard down. You've got to be ready for the next time. We all just need to be vigilant and, you know, be the next hero, hopefully, if you see something.

Content obtained from FBI Website

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/9-11 Experiments - The Force Behind the Motion.mp4 9-11 Experiments - The Force Behind the Motion

There are many experiments and videos on the internet that show that the official story cannot be true about the collapse of these buildings, yet not one experiment or video that shows how the official story is correct. That should say volumes right there. it' like stating that the dinosaurs did not exist even though the bones of these massive creatures are found. the opposition would just say, no they are too big to have existed in the face of absolute proof. However there are those ancient ones who said the world was flat and the earth was the center of the universe; and when anyone doubted what they said they were shunned, insulted, ridiculed, imprisoned or even killed. Does this sound familiar to the 9/11 debunker's. A mind with a belief system is the most difficult to change because it is closed to anything new if it does not fit nicely into their belief system. They will ignore any and all facts that do not support their belief. How can a nerd be smarter than our government agencies and the debunker's. Read More...

Newton's laws of motion are three physical laws that, together, laid the foundation for classical mechanics. They describe the relationship between a body and the forces acting upon it, and its motion in response to those forces. More precisely, the first law defines the force qualitatively, the second law offers a quantitative measure of the force, and the third asserts that a single isolated force doesn't exist. These three laws have been expressed in several different ways, over nearly three centuries,[1] and can be summarized as follows: First law:    In an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a force.[2][3] Second law:    In an inertial reference frame, the vector sum of the forces F on an object is equal to the mass m of that object multiplied by the acceleration a of the object: F = ma. (It is assumed here that the mass m is constant - see below.) Third law:    When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.

Laws Newton's first law Main article: Inertia Explanation of Newton's first law and reference frames (MIT Course 8.01)[11][12] The first law states that if the net force (the vector sum of all forces acting on an object) is zero, then the velocity of the object is constant. Velocity is a vector quantity which expresses both the object's speed and the direction of its motion; therefore, the statement that the object's velocity is constant is a statement that both its speed and the direction of its motion are constant. The first law can be stated mathematically when the mass is a non-zero constant, as,

Consequently,     An object that is at rest will stay at rest unless a force acts upon it.     An object that is in motion will not change its velocity unless a force acts upon it. This is known as uniform motion. An object continues to do whatever it happens to be doing unless a force is exerted upon it. If it is at rest, it continues in a state of rest (demonstrated when a tablecloth is skillfully whipped from under dishes on a tabletop and the dishes remain in their initial state of rest). If an object is moving, it continues to move without turning or changing its speed. This is evident in space probes that continuously move in outer space. Changes in motion must be imposed against the tendency of an object to retain its state of motion. In the absence of net forces, a moving object tends to move along a straight line path indefinitely. Newton placed the first law of motion to establish frames of reference for which the other laws are applicable. The first law of motion postulates the existence of at least one frame of reference called a Newtonian or inertial reference frame, relative to which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is a straight line at a constant speed.[8][13] Newton's first law is often referred to as the law of inertia. Thus, a condition necessary for the uniform motion of a particle relative to an inertial reference frame is that the total net force acting on it is zero. In this sense, the first law can be restated as:     In every material universe, the motion of a particle in a preferential reference frame Φ is determined by the action of forces whose total vanished for all times when and only when the velocity of the particle is constant in Φ. That is, a particle initially at rest or in uniform motion in the preferential frame Φ continues in that state unless compelled by forces to change it.[14] Newton's first and second laws are valid only in an inertial reference frame. Any reference frame that is in uniform motion with respect to an inertial frame is also an inertial frame, i.e. Galilean invariance or the principle of Newtonian relativity.[15]

Newton's second law Explanation of Newton's second law, using gravity as an example (MIT OCW)[16] The second law states that the rate of change of momentum of a body is directly proportional to the force applied, and this change in momentum takes place in the direction of the applied force. The second law can also be stated in terms of an object's acceleration. Since Newton's second law is valid only for constant-mass systems,[17][18][19] m can be taken outside the differentiation operator by the constant factor rule in differentiation. Thus,

where F is the net force applied, m is the mass of the body, and a is the body's acceleration. Thus, the net force applied to a body produces a proportional acceleration. In other words, if a body is accelerating, then there is a force on it. An application of this notation is the derivation of G Subscript C. Consistent with the first law, the time derivative of the momentum is non-zero when the momentum changes direction, even if there is no change in its magnitude; such is the case with uniform circular motion. The relationship also implies the conservation of momentum: when the net force on the body is zero, the momentum of the body is constant. Any net force is equal to the rate of change of the momentum. Any mass that is gained or lost by the system will cause a change in momentum that is not the result of an external force. A different equation is necessary for variable-mass systems (see below). Newton's second law requires modification if the effects of special relativity are to be taken into account, because at high speeds the approximation that momentum is the product of rest mass and velocity is not accurate. Impulse An impulse J occurs when a force F acts over an interval of time Δt, and it is given by[20][21] Since force is the time derivative of momentum, it follows that This relation between impulse and momentum is closer to Newton's wording of the second law.[22] Impulse is a concept frequently used in the analysis of collisions and impacts.[23] Variable-mass systems Main article: Variable-mass system Variable-mass systems, like a rocket burning fuel and ejecting spent gases, are not closed and cannot be directly treated by making mass a function of time in the second law;[18] that is, the following formula is wrong:[19] The falsehood of this formula can be seen by noting that it does not respect Galilean invariance: a variable-mass object with F = 0 in one frame will be seen to have F ≠ 0 in another frame.[17] The correct equation of motion for a body whose mass m varies with time by either ejecting or accreting mass is obtained by applying the second law to the entire, constant-mass system consisting of the body and its ejected/accreted mass; the result is[17] where u is the velocity of the escaping or incoming mass relative to the body. From this equation one can derive the equation of motion for a varying mass system, for example, the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. Under some conventions, the quantity u dm/dt on the left-hand side, which represents the advection of momentum, is defined as a force (the force exerted on the body by the changing mass, such as rocket exhaust) and is included in the quantity F. Then, by substituting the definition of acceleration, the equation becomes F = ma.

Newton's third law

An illustration of Newton's third law in which two skaters push against each other. The first skater on the left exerts a normal force N12 on the second skater directed towards the right, and the second skater exerts a normal force N21 on the first skater directed towards the left. The magnitudes of both forces are equal, but they have opposite directions, as dictated by Newton's third law. A description of Newton's third law and contact forces[24] The third law states that all forces between two objects exist in equal magnitude and opposite direction: if one object A exerts a force FA on a second object B, then B simultaneously exerts a force FB on A, and the two forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction: FA = −FB.[25] The third law means that all forces are interactions between different bodies,[26][27] or different regions within one body, and thus that there is no such thing as a force that is not accompanied by an equal and opposite force. In some situations, the magnitude and direction of the forces are determined entirely by one of the two bodies, say Body A; the force exerted by Body A on Body B is called the "action", and the force exerted by Body B on Body A is called the "reaction".

This law is sometimes referred to as the action-reaction law, with FA called the "action" and FB the "reaction". In other situations the magnitude and directions of the forces are determined jointly by both bodies and it isn't necessary to identify one force as the "action" and the other as the "reaction". The action and the reaction are simultaneous, and it does not matter which is called the action and which is called reaction; both forces are part of a single interaction, and neither force exists without the other.[25]

The two forces in Newton's third law are of the same type (e.g., if the road exerts a forward frictional force on an accelerating car's tires, then it is also a frictional force that Newton's third law predicts for the tires pushing backward on the road). From a conceptual standpoint, Newton's third law is seen when a person walks: they push against the floor, and the floor pushes against the person. Similarly, the tires of a car push against the road while the road pushes back on the tires—the tires and road simultaneously push against each other. In swimming, a person interacts with the water, pushing the water backward, while the water simultaneously pushes the person forward—both the person and the water push against each other. The reaction forces account for the motion in these examples. These forces depend on friction; a person or car on ice, for example, may be unable to exert the action force to produce the needed reaction force.[28]

Obtained from Wikipedia

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/TV nerd beats NASA engineer with 9-11 Truth physics.mp4 TV Nerd Beats NASA Engineer With 9/11 Truth Physics

Sometimes The Truth About 9/11 Shows Up In The Oddest Places. On a recent episode of the TBS reality show King of the Nerds, a bubbly, pink-haired video game blogger named Danielle was the unlikely winner of one phase of a science-related competition that pitted her against a NASA engineer and three other contenders. The most intriguing aspect of her upset win was that Danielle used "9/11 conspiracy" websites to outsmart her rivals. I came across this video that dropped a bowling ball through a tower of supported separated sheets of glass and the contestants had to guess how many sheet of glass the bowling ball would go through before stopping and that got me thinking; what a visual that would be to show how the towers collapsed or did not collapse. Expanding on this idea; enlarge the panes and restructure the rig, set it on fire... This is the video that should be circulating the internet. Let the debunker's explain this away! Physics is REAL! The debunker's M.O is to most likely ignore it... What I am gleaning to; is to stack sheets of glass (tempered or not) as the floors similar to the way that the trade center towers were built (of course weighing them etc...), then dropping a weight equivalent to multiple floors above the point of collapse onto the glass to show that how many floors (weight) that one would have to place above the point of collapse for it to break thru all the glass floors below. I am sure you get my direction with this test.

I have sent this suggestion to Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth. This visual results can be proven time and time again. Release the results along with the testing specifications for others to repeat the test (peer review). When an organization can no longer be trusted to tell the truth, we HAVE to make a new one that can.

https://911researcharchives.org/911/videos/9-11 Crash Test 2016.mp4 9/11 Crash Test 2016

On the website 911crashtest.org, Steve De'ak had an idea that I think is great. What I propose is that a reparable organization perform these test with the data shared for peer review. I offered this idea to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 For Truth to get their reaction. This I think would be a great way to show what is or isn't possible. All this speculation about this incident could be over and done with. The tests should be performed a number of times with varying speeds and various plane parts to see at what speed something like what happened with the plane and the WTC Tower is possible or not. Now Popular Mechanics who is debunking 9/11 and is using theory instead test; owns the popular T.V. Show Myth Busters and to this day has decided NOT to do any debunking that can be proven or disproven like this test. You have to ask yourself WHY? They have all the technology, the facilities and the show that does nothing but TEST the facts about myths. It would seem that this would be the perfect way to end speculation with facts... BUT THEY DO NOT!, strange. Nothing to gain everything to lose maybe... The truth needs to be exposed; Good or Bad!

NIST is a non-regulatory federal agency under the Department of Commerce. NIST is the United States National Measurement Institute.
Which seems to have been turned into a political podium taking away from it's history of excellence.

Second Controller Speaks About Korean Airliner Incident on 9/11 By Lori Townsend, Alaska Public Media - September 12, 2011 Another Air Traffic controller who says he worked with Korean flight 085 that was diverted to Whitehorse on Sept. 11, 2001 has come forward with additional details of the day's events. APRN reported Friday that retired Air Traffic Controller Rick Wilder says the pilot was ordered to squawk that he had hijackers on board. Dave Connett worked as an Air Traffic Controller in Anchorage for 15 years and was also in the tower and worked the flight that was suspected of being hijacked that day. Connett contends he was the one that first ordered the pilot to squawk the 7500 hijack code. Connett says it was because of a message the pilot had sent to his own company Korean Airlines. "He as I understood it, Sent a company message, saying he was hijacked and that got to us so we were expecting a hijacked aircraft when we finally did greet or identify him and talk to him." Connett said. Connett says he asked the pilot to verify squawking 7500 and he says the pilot said disregard. Then Connett's area manager told him to squawk the hijack code. Connett says he gave the order and the pilot did not argue, he complied. "So at that point, we figured well he must be getting hijacked. I was given instructions that he could not go to Anchorage. So I tried to turn him away from Anchorage and he was very resistant. It took several transmissions to convince him that he could not and he was not going to go to Anchorage." Connett said. Connett says he's also a pilot and had never before given such a command. He says the order to tell the plane to squawk 7500 – meaning it had been hijacked – surprised him. But he looked later and it was in the FAA manual. He says when those regulations were written, it was presumed that a hijacker would be someone bursting into a cockpit with a weapon. Connett says. "And one of those would be, a scenario that if a hijacker is standing in the cockpit and he's telling a pilot what to do, and the controller tells him to do something, like squawk 7500, the hijacker normally wouldn't know what that means. So if the pilot did it it would confirm that he is being hijacked. But if he wasn't being hijacked it is incumbent upon the pilot to say, to know the code and to say, no I'm not being hijacked." The pilot's lack of protest about the code added to the suspicion that the Korean jet had been hijacked. This confusion is what then NORAD commander, now Air Force General Norton Schwartz outlined when he spoke to reporters in the days after the event. Schwartz said that if controllers asked pilots to confirm if they were squawking that code, the correct response would be negative, negative, I am not that code. General Scwartz continued. "Apparently what occurred was that the crew either misconstrued what was said or perhaps what was said wasn't exactly, you know, according to the text book and they understood that they should squawk that code." Dave Connett says he wanted to clarify some of the day's events and affirm that the jet had been sent to Whitehorse because of concerns it was in fact a hijacked plane and it was determined that sending it to Whitehorse endangered less lives than Anchorage.